Skip to main content

Book Review (Fiction) The Improbable Theory of Ana & Zak

THE IMPROBABLE THEORY OF ANA & ZAK

Brian Katcher

Katherine Tegen Books 2015              328 Pages

There’s a gap wider than the entire breadth of the alphabet between  A (Ana) and Z (Zak), the high school protagonists of this Young Adult comedy of escalating errors.

A type A personality, driven overachiever and straight-A student Ana Watson resembles a proto-Margaret Thatcher. The product of  a strict upbringing, repressed Ana is meekly subservient to parental diktats while coming across as arrogant and aloof to everyone else.
 
Happy-go-lucky slacker Zakory “Duke” Duquette, on the other hand, has no clear goals in life and is happy to drift along; indulging his fondness for such geeky pastimes as role-playing games, comic books, science fiction movies and other such manifestations of American pop culture.

Both characters are humanly flawed, somewhat irritating and fairly well-rounded. Not very likable initially, A and Z are reluctantly thrown together for purposes of an inter-school quiz contest. But Ana is not the only one chafing under her parent’s strict regime. Younger brother Clayton, fired by Zak’s accounts of attending past Sci-Fi conventions, goes AWOL from the quiz team’s hotel to visit the “WashingCon". 

What follows is a desperate teaming of two very disparate characters to retrieve the errant prodigal with no one in authority the wiser– and so avert feared parental retribution. Naturally, Murphy’s Law reigns and everything that can go wrong does.

Even if the many comic disasters the duo encounter in the course of their quest over a frenetic 24 hours appear to be occasionally unbelievable in their intensity and frequency, the action zips along quite nicely. The author’s amused affection for the tropes of typical science fiction and fantasy conventions comes across and geek sub-culture is nicely portrayed.

There’s a lot of deft situational comedy in this page-turner, but Zak and Ana’s growing attraction feels more like an immature, misplaced crush than a legitimate romance between two almost-adults. Instead of dating happily ever after by the close, they seem more likely to drive each other around the bend.

“Improbable” is a good word to describe their pairing, and this YA romp doesn’t really prove the improbable theory of its central romance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Book Review (Fiction) - Bad Dad

Bad Dad David Walliams Illustrated by Tony Ross HarperCollins Children’s Books 2017                                                   422 Pages           There once used to be a preachy school of sententious Victorian children’s fiction wherein the bad boy was eaten up by a lion for his wickedness; whilst the good boy came into deserved fame and fortune, before being drawn up to heaven by God and his angels. Thankfully, kid lit had come a long way since those awful days. Bad Dad is gleefully anarchic, but no less moralistic, plentiful comic havoc notwithstanding. The “Bad Dad” of the title isn’t really bad; he’s a racing champion crippled after a horrific crash and bla...

Book Review (Fiction) In The Valley OF Shadows

In The Valley Of Shadows Abhay Narayan Sapru Chlorophyll Books 2017                                             170 Pages The long guerrilla war waged against the British state by the IRA in Northern Ireland spawned a new literary sub-genre, “the troubles thriller” as practiced by authors such as Chris Petit ( The Psalm Killer ), Stephen Leather ( The Chinaman , The Bombmaker )  and Gerald Seymour ( Harry’s Game , Field Of Blood ) . The current conflict in Kashmir, with Pakistan-sponsored terrorist proxies attempting to wrest the state away from India, seems all set to follow suit .  Some of the growing tribe of authors in this nascent sub-genre have backgrounds in journalism covering the valley or have actually served in the Indian Army there. ...

A Decline In Violence?

I’ve recently read “The Better Angels Of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined” by Stephen Pinker. The author’s contention is that a plethora of civilizing influences such as the rule of law replacing vendetta, humanistic education and the complex socio-political inter-relationships caused by commerce have caused a general decline in violence worldwide. Your chances of getting murdered were much more in 1700 than today. While this may be hard to believe, given the accounts of sexual assault and homicide that greet us in the daily newspapers every morning, I think that Pinker might be on to something.  To be fair, the author makes explicit that social violence has declined, but not uniformly worldwide, and is still far from completely extinct. The level of decline also depends on how evolved a society is and how far removed from tribalism it is. Pinker also makes the point that if the conditions that caused this decline are reversed, violence could well enjoy a late resurg...